gm, happy sunday this is an appreciate post for @KaminoFinance and @JupiterExchange for years, i have had funds in @aave and i do consider them the most trusted borrow/lend platform however, let's look at some UI/UX vomit moments just did a swap lost a small amount to slippage, trading fees.

2/ but this is the ui now aave takes a fee, that's fine. minimum received, also fine. but if i add 0.05% slippage, why would it quote a minimum of 0.2% slippage?

3/ and then the ui of @MetaMask gives us this? clearly @infinex will take over, because this is so bad like i will get 4463USDC.e (that e is already a UX nightmare) and then @MetaMask shows it as 10 numbers...

4/ now @solana has native usdc, and the usdce is connected to @ethena_labs ... hence another ux problem with this circle-ish usdc.e. but i will use this @wormhole example.

5/ and if i did swap it... I know I would get that amount, because i tested it. kamino adds a "minimum amount received" but I have never got lower than my simulation, which @solflare does so well, which is the main quote from kamino

6/ now solana isn't perfect. even having usdc wormhole is a little annoying, but it's so much more seamless. so, i have sold some ETH... and it's going into SOL. i am happy if ETH goes up, but aave, polygon, ethereum, and metamask have been building for so long, why does the UX still scream, 2021.

7/ finally, i know @MetaMask updated their UI, but i did it like this as I had to force update it (probably a chrome problem to be fair) but even still, after a refresh, it's still this bad so yeah, trade the ETH/SOL chart how you wish, but the masses won't use evm tek