In my new response to Nucleus Genomics, I demonstrate that their own reply to my first post: - Completely ignores the fake reviews, IP theft lawsuit, and history of falsifying metrics - Admits that Origin is not novel - Admits that they plagiarized from the Herasight whitepaper - Admits that the paper contained numerous errors Thanks to Nucleus's response, I was also able to identify *even more* methodological problems and circumstantial evidence of plagiarism.

I've just written a new post raising a series of concerns about Nucleus Genomics, a company that offers embryo selection services based on polygenic scores for couples undergoing IVF. I was shocked by the degree to which Nucleus's work is obviously plagiarized or simply wrong.